Archive for June, 2009

Creating a sense of urgency

Creating a sense of urgency in your life leads to success.  And there’s a study out that proves it.  A good friend of mine, Greg Schneiders, recently sent to me a NYTimes story about a study on the issue of motivation, fear, and something economists call “loss avoidance.”

The question is this — when your back is up against the wall and you MUST do something or risk losing, are you better at doing what you do than when you simply have an opportunity and CAN do something to win.

national-lampoon-73For the Wharton professors, question was this:  “All other things being equal, is there a difference between a putt for a par and a putt for a birdie?”  For folks not skilled in the rules and scoring of golf, a par is the number of shots set as a “standard” for a particular hole.  A “birdie” is one less than par.  So a hole that is set on the scorecard as a “par 4” is a hole that you’re expected to complete in four strokes or shots.  If you do it in three, that’s a birdie.

Back to the question.  Is there any difference between a 4 foot birdie putt and a 4 foot par putt?

Apparently there is.  According to the study:

Even the world’s best pros are so consumed with avoiding bogeys that they make putts for birdie discernibly less often than identical-length putts for par, according to a coming paper by two professors at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. After analyzing laser-precise data on more than 1.6 million Tour putts, they estimated that this preference for avoiding a negative (bogey) more than gaining an equal positive (birdie) — known in economics as loss aversion — costs the average pro about one stroke per 72-hole tournament, and the top 20 golfers about $1.2 million in prize money a year.

What does that mean?  It means that faced with two identical putts — one for birdie and one for par — the pros are more likely to make the par putt because they have to and miss the birdie putt because … well … because they can.  According to  Justin Leonard:

“When putting for birdie, you realize that, most of the time, it’s acceptable to make par. When you’re putting for par, there’s probably a greater sense of urgency, so therefore you’re willing to be more aggressive in order not to drop a shot. It makes sense.”

So there it is … the key phrase … “a greater sense of urgency.”

Reminds me of the National Lampoon cover.  If you don’t buy this magazine then I’ll shoot the dog.

A greater sense of urgency.

So don’t get fat and comfortable.  You’ll miss the putt.

Create a greater sense of urgency … we’ll all perform better.

Top Ten

Most folks who know me know that I’m a BIG fan of the number three.

In fact, I should write a post about the number three.  I think I’ll do that.  Stay tuned.

Three is the perfect number.  It is nature.  It is morning, noon, and night.  It is breakfast, lunch, and dinner.  It is the perfect triangle.  The triune God.  It is the Hegelian dialectic – thesis, antithesis, and synthesis.  It is even Obamaesque.  Check out his non-state of the union address to Congress in January.  What did he talk about?  Three things:  education, energy, and health care.  Fact is that THREE is the number for just about every speech, sermon, or presentation structure.  But I’m going to write a post about three so I’ll stop now.

151fsesame-street-count-to-ten-postersAnd talk about ten.

Now that’s an interesting number.  Ten most wanted.  Ten commandments.   Top ten.  A “perfect” ten.  Ten is a bit odd in that it is associated both with the divine (God’s commandments) and the deplorable (FBI’s ten most wanted).  It is associated with children (Sesame Street) and sports (Big Ten).

So it is in that spirit that I call attention to two “10” pieces I saw recently.

First is the “10” is Lon Safko’s “The Ten Commandments of Blogging“.  Interesting.  I thought everyone was on Twitter now and had abandoned their WordPress platform.    Pretty good stuff.  I don’t do all of them.  Then again, I can’t say that I keep all of the REAL ten commandments.  But I like Lon’s approach.  Note that he saved the best to last.  Be creative.  Have fun.

Second is Graham Charleton’s top ten social media pr screw ups on eConsultancy.  These are certainly the most famous.  I do take issue with a couple of them.  Personally, I thought Domino’s strategy in responding to the employee video was pretty good.  They certainly couldn’t be blamed for having a couple of  goof-ball employees out of the tens of thousands that they hire.  And the fact that they responded in the same media as the source (YouTube) was pretty smart.  Lots of folks would have gone straight to Good Morning America or something stupid like that.

But I guess he needed ten.  That’s that other nice thing about three.  There’s only three of them.

Finding Out that Your Professor Was a Spy

The name sounded so familiar.  It was the Walter that threw me off.  I didn’t know any Walter Meyers.

Ever find out something about someone way after you knew them that really threw you for a loop?  More to the point, find out something that was happening to someone way back when and you NEVER knew what he or she was going through?

Welcome Kendall Meyers, the newly discovered Cuban spy.

Kendall was my European Studies professor at Johns Hopkins SAIS.  Now I find out he was a spy.  Not only that, it appears that we was being “turned” – isn’t that what they call it? – right when I was studying and working with him back in the early 1980s.

My, my, my.

spy-vs-spy-without-bombs-775529Here’s how I rememer Kendall.

He had a more-than-slight resemblance of Donald Sutherland.  He was tall and lanky and bearded.  He spoke in well-rounded words with a certain intensity and glee that got young minds excited.  He was extremely curious with a razor-sharp logicians’ reckoning that meant you had better thought a few moves ahead if you were going to make a challenge.  I remember him to be kind, but firm.  He didn’t hide his liberal views (this was the first Reagan Administration) but I didn’t find him militant or bitter — only challenging.  He’d be the guy who’d have that “challenge authority” bumper sticker on his car.

He loved the Zebra Lounge off Mass Ave. which he would constantly remind us has the best pizza / beer combination in Washington DC.

But most of all I remember his curiosity and his emotion.  He was the type of instructor (I can’t remember whether he was working on his PhD or had just finished with David Calleo) that would ask you why you thought something and seemed to really  be interested in the answer you gave.  He would be the one to say “I’m curious why you say that.”  But he’d also be the one who’d as passionately simply say that the conclusion you’ve come to is wrong.  And say that with a zeal and conviction — but no malice! – that betrayed a passion in convictions.

That was the Kendall I knew at SAIS.

I had plenty of professors at SAIS that I suspected as a spy.  But I suspected them all of working for the CIA.

How odd that Kendall would be Castro’s eyes and ears in Washington.

Books and covers.  A reminder of all the secrets we keep.